Apart from overcoming daunting software development challenges, creators of multimedia works must maneuver through a labyrinth of third party intellectual property and other legal rights relating to the content they may wish to include in their products.
Multimedia Software Defined
As the term is currently used, “multimedia software” generally refers to a class of software products combining in digital form graphic, still and/or moving visual images displayed on a computer screen, typically accompanied by music, narration and/or other sounds and text. This information is manipulated by the user “interactively” by executing software commands through a keyboard, mouse or other input device.
Multimedia software programs often consist of subject matter or content previously existing in other discrete or separate media such as books, movies, videos and music CDs, each of which is typically independently protected by copyright and other laws. This information is then modified, combined with new material, and adapted into its new form to allow interactive access and searching via a computer. The aggregation of various pre-existing forms of content created by the publishing, movie and music industries with newly created software and new content, creates many opportunities for inadvertent infringement and violation of third party rights. This article provides a quick summary of some of the various rights third parties may have in multimedia content that developers need to be aware of in order to negotiate necessary usage licenses and avoid infringement.
The law applicable to the development of multimedia works is a hodgepodge of existing legal principles, some of which may be familiar to developers in the context of protecting their own products. They also can apply to protect the rights of third parties in various forms of content a developer might wish to include in its multimedia work. Some areas of the law likely to be involved are described below.
Copyright law protects original works of authorship fixed in tangible form. It will likely apply to protect nearly every item of pre-existing third party content a multimedia developer would include in its product. Under federal law, copyright owners are afforded certain exclusive rights that may vary depending on the form of the content, whether an audio or video clip, graphic art image, photograph, music sample, dramatic work or other text or software. These exclusive rights are the right to reproduce (in any form), distribute, create derivative versions or adaptations, publicly display and publicly perform the copyrighted work. A multimedia developer’s digitization and transformation of any pre-existing copyrighted work without permission of the copyright owner constitutes infringement. Willful and intentional copyright infringement can carry a penalty of up to $100,000 per infringed work.
Notwithstanding the above, a developer may be free to use otherwise copyrightable content which has entered the “public domain.” A work may be in the public domain if the period for copyright protection has lapsed or the copyright owner has forfeited its copyright, for example, by publishing a work prior to March 1, 1989, without the familiar copyright notice the law then required. Additionally, some content protected by copyright law may be usable under the “fair use” doctrine, which sometimes permits limited use of excerpts from copyrighted works without the need to obtain permission from the copyright owner. These exceptions, however, are not likely to be of much value. For example, while Bram Stoker’s novel Dracula may be in the public domain, Francis Ford Coppola’s film version is not. A developer would be ill-advised not to seek permission from the copyright owner before incorporating a clip from the film in its product. Similarly, the fair use doctrine is an amorphous legal principle that is applied on a case-by-case basis and is argued as a defense to an allegation of copyright infringement. A defendant in an infringement action has a substantial burden of proof if the excerpted material claimed to be a fair use is used in a commercial work sold for profit.
While copyright issues might dominate a multimedia developer’s legal concerns, the trademark rights of third party content owners must also be assessed. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office defines a trademark as a word, phrase, symbol or design, or combination of any of them, which identifies and distinguishes one source of goods or services from another. Unauthorized use of another’s trademark, or use of a trademark confusingly similar to another’s mark, can constitute infringement and subject the developer to monetary damages and injunctive relief.
For example, assume a developer wishes to use the character Simba, the protagonist in Disney’s The Lion King, in a multimedia work about the living habits of lions in the wild. Unless a usage license is obtained, this would not only infringe the copyright in the character’s illustrated design, but the trademark rights in its name as used in connection with marketing and promoting the film and ancillary products. Further, the developer might face additional liability under unfair competition law for falsely implying that Disney had endorsed its product.
An individual has the right to control the commercial use of his or her name, signature, voice, likeness and other personal characteristics. Any or all of these characteristics can have significant economic value, especially, for example, if one used to play basketball for the Chicago Bulls and has scored 63 points in one game. Unauthorized use in a multimedia work of any protectable aspect of a celebrity’s image can give rise to liability for injunctive relief and monetary damages. In most states, the right of publicity descends to one’s heirs. Accordingly, even if a developer obtains permission from the copyright owner to incorporate into its multimedia work a film clip of Babe Ruth’s 714th home run, Ruth’s heirs might have separately enforceable rights of publicity in the use of his image. The developer would need to obtain a release to avoid liability.
The right of privacy is related to the right of publicity except that privacy rights do not depend on their owner’s commercial activities. The right of privacy is essentially the right to be left alone. One commits the tort of invasion of privacy by doing any of the following: (i) appropriating someone’s name or likeness for gain; (ii) intruding on another’s physical solitude or seclusion; (iii) publicly disclosing private or embarrassing information, even if true; or (iv) engaging in publicity that places an individual in a false light.
Developers need to be aware of privacy rights any time a multimedia work uses a reference to any specific individual or incorporates an individual’s image. For example, a developer’s use in its product of a photograph of a person, even if permission has been obtained from the photo’s copyright owner, can result in liability for privacy right violations unless permission from the individual depicted is obtained.
Legal Due Diligence
Determining who may have rights in the various forms of third party content to be included in a multimedia work requires thorough legal analysis. Obtaining the necessary licenses and releases from the identified parties is a time-consuming but essential step the developer must take to minimize its legal liability.
(Recommended further reading: The Software Publishers Association Legal Guide to Multimedia by Thomas J. Smedinghoff, Addison-Wesley 1994.)
Attorney Eric Freibrun specializes in Computer law and Intellectual Property protection, providing legal services to information technology vendors and users. Tel.: 847-562-0099; Fax: 847-562-0033; E-mail: email@example.com.